• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (0)
  •  

Go back to original report, commission urged

 Argyle Warden Aldric d’Entremont addresses the boundaries commission on behalf of the Municipality of Argyle.  Tina Comeau photo

Argyle Warden Aldric d’Entremont addresses the boundaries commission on behalf of the Municipality of Argyle.Tina Comeau photo

Published on August 14, 2012
Published on August 14, 2012
Eric Bourque  RSS Feed

Latest News

See All Articles

Regional News

See All Articles

Topics :
Commerce d’Argyle Chamber of Commerce , Mariners Centre , Nova Scotia , Yarmouth

By Eric Bourque

THE VANGUARD

NovaNewsNow.com

 

Representatives of the Acadian community told the commission reviewing Nova Scotia’s provincial electoral boundaries Monday night that the commission got it right the first time.

Like almost everyone else who addressed the commission during a public meeting in a packed Mariners Centre, speakers representing Acadian organizations – including the Conseil acadien de Par-en-Bas (CAPEB) and the Chambre de Commerce d’Argyle Chamber of Commerce – said the commission did the right thing in its first interim report by recommending that the electoral boundaries of Nova Scotia’s minority ridings remain the same.

Norbert LeBlanc, president of CAPEB, said the commission had demonstrated vision and leadership in its first interim report by using the terms of reference given to it as a guide.

The province rejected the commission’s interim report, namely its recommendation to keep the boundaries of Nova Scotia’s so-called protected ridings (Argyle, Clare, Richmond and Preston) unchanged, despite a voter population for each that is well below the provincial average and outside the 25 per cent variance.

The government indicated – after receiving the commission’s first interim report – that the 25 per cent variance was a binding requirement, that no riding should have a population 25 per cent below or above the average for the province. This sent the commission back to work, which, in turn, led to the controversial new boundary recommendations that set the stage for Monday night’s meeting.

The recommendations of the commission’s revised interim report – making three ridings into two by creating a Yarmouth-Argyle constituency and a Clare-Yarmouth one – are completely unacceptable, LeBlanc said in his presentation to the commission.

Like other speakers, LeBlanc said the commission’s revised interim report calls into question the independence of the commission. The commission’s hands appeared to be tied, he said, another point raised by other presenters.

The apparent political interference in the workings of what is supposed to be an independent commission is disconcerting and troubling, said Réal Boudreau, speaking on behalf of the Chambre de Commerce d’Argyle Chamber of Commerce.

What the boundaries commission is now proposing – merging the Argyle riding with  part of Yarmouth and merging Clare with the other part of Yarmouth – is a step backward for the Acadian community and for the province, he said.

The chamber’s position has not changed from when the commission held its first round of public meetings back in the spring, he said, adding that the chamber wants the status quo for the Argyle, Clare and Yarmouth ridings.

Delivering a similar message was Argyle Warden Aldric d’Entremont, who said the commission should go back to the recommendations of its first interim report and keep the boundaries of the ridings in question as they are.

Referring to what the revised report is suggesting, he said, “It dilutes the Acadian voice to the point of near silence.”

He referred to remarks made during the winter by Graham Steele, Nova Scotia’s Acadian affairs minister at the time, who urged those who were concerned about the future of the province’s minority ridings to let the boundaries commission to its work.

“You demonstrated democracy at its finest,” d’Entremont said, referring to the commission’s first interim report and its support of the status quo for minority ridings. “You can imagine our subsequent disappointment (by the changes recommended in the revised report).”

Argyle MLA Chris d’Entremont said the government had demonstrated “blatant disregard for the political process” by the way it set the terms of reference for the boundaries commission.

Father Maurice LeBlanc, another of the evening’s speakers, raised a point that many have touched on since the boundary issue first started making headlines back around the New Year’s holiday. The drawing of electoral boundaries, he said, should be based on more than just numbers.

 

 

Note: The Electoral Boundaries Commission is holding a public consultation session Tuesday, Aug. 14 at Université Ste. Anne in Church Point beginning at 6 p.m. 

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Ad Finder

May 21st 2013

View our Newspaper ads

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Advertising